Men Pay Up To 79% More for Car Insurance than Women
Male motorists pay up to 79% more for car insurance than
females in the same age group according to research by price comparison website MoneySupermarket.com.
The biggest disparity in pricing between males and females
is in the young driver market, where male motorists are being handicapped by
the boy racer reputation.
Statistics
The following statistics reveal the average car insurance premiums
which are offered to motorists in the following age brackets who own a 1.25
litre Ford Fiesta travelling the average 10,000 miles per year:
Age |
Male |
Female |
Difference |
Percentage
Difference |
18 |
£7,233.96 |
£4,141.54 |
£3,092.42 |
79% |
19 |
£3,299.94 |
£2,559.13 |
£740.81 |
59% |
20 |
£2,073.69 |
£1,606.55 |
£467.14 |
52% |
30 |
£596.34 |
£495.17 |
£101.16 |
19% |
40 |
£433.47 |
£410.80 |
£22.67 |
2.6% |
It can clearly be seen that young male motorists are the
most penalised groups when it comes to insurance discrimination, with 18 year
old male drivers paying on average £3,092.42 per year more for car insurance
than their female equivalents.
Why are young men so heavily penalised?
According
to government figures, male motorists are the recipients of more than 98% of
the convictions for dangerous driving which are handed out in the
UK
each year.
Additionally,
research by the road safety organisation Brake revealed that one in four of the
fatal crashes which occur in the UK each involve drivers under the age of 25.
This is despite the fact that motorists in this age group make up just 12.5% of
the total driving population in the country.
When put
into the context of these statistics, it is unsurprising that young male
motorists are on the receiving end of such high prices, with the insurance
companies ultimately being the ones who are forced to fork out for the costs of
accidents involving their car insurance customers.
The fairness of statistics
There has
been much debate over the fairness of using these statistics in order to
determine car insurance quotes. One side of the argument, which has the support
of the AA, is that there are "sound statistical reasons" to help justify why
males pay more than females, with insurers using these statistics in order to
quantify the level of risk a potential customer represents.
This is a
viewpoint which is shared by MoneySupermarket.com's Julie Owens, who added that
it would be unfair to distribute the additional costs accrued for the insurer
by these unsafe motorists on groups which are statistically safer drivers.
However this
is not the opinion of everyone, with a 21 year old male contributor to the
MoneySupermarket.com forum complaining: "I'm 21 next week and I pay £1,780
insurance for a 1.2 Corsa. I consider myself to be a good driver and don't
believe I should be charged more because the typical 21 year old male is a boy
racer. I'm not!"
New
regulations
These
arguments were recently presented to the European Court of Justice (ECJ)
following a campaign by Belgian consumer group Test-Achats.
The ECJ
ultimately decreed that it was unfair to use gender to discriminate against
motorists in the insurance market. It is expected that female car insurance
prices will increase by up to 30% on the back of this, which will add an
additional £1,242.46 to the average 18 year old female's car insurance
premiums.
Julia
Owen's prediction about the insurer's expenditure being recovered from
statistically safer motorists is ultimately being proven. But despite the ECJ
ruling, the fairness of this method is still a matter of much debate in the
industry.